Monday, September 24, 2012

To:Tennessee State Legislators

To: Tennessee State Legislators*                                                                      9/24/12
Subject: One Question: What would your children say?

I awoke this morning after a restless night in which voter suppression played out in conversations in my mind.

For weeks leading up to this morning, I had been involved in this issue as a recorder of activities protesting the voter I.D. law and the actions of the Knoxville Election Commission in closing a voting site of sixty years based on one bogus complaint.

I video-recorded speakers at rallies in Krutch Park and made special trips to register on video the complaints of Knoxville citizens who were victims of this abuse of the legislative process. I recorded

  1. Citizen Mark Harmon as he stood on the handicap access ramp of Belle Morris Elementary School to make the point of its existence to challenge the Commission’s contention that they closed it for lack of access. I recorded him at the designated alternative, the Cox Center, with its obvious lack of parking, some twenty spots at a site where almost 1300 voters will attempt to cast ballots. I recorded his observations of Gloria Johnson, local resident and also a Democratic candidate for state office who pointed out that residents had just now received new voter cards with the new polling site on them, many of whom would just put them in their wallets without a thought and show up at Belle Morris School on voting day, only to be redirected, and who then may not vote when they cannot park in the new location.

  1. Citizen Brian Stevens, a professor at the University of Tennessee, who held in his hands two photo I.D.s: one, his own faculty I.D. which is accepted as proof for voting, and an almost identical Student I.D. which is not. He made his case that the reason for the difference is to keep a distinct group from voting.


  1. A woman who spent an entire day taking her 90+ year old aunt from place after place to gather up the five pieces of information her poll worker said was needed in order for her to continue to vote, as she had done without incident since 1948.


The recordings are many, and they are posted on various internet social media sites, so you’d think I’d be happy that I did my part. But the voices of the disenfranchised are ringing in my mind still. And, this morning, I awoke thinking, what do legislators tell their children about cheating, about lying and stealing. Because, each one of them, and they together as a group decided to cheat the voting process, to lie about their reasons for doing so and, in the process steal the votes of thousands of individual citizens whom they promised to serve. What will you, State Senator Steve Southerland from Morristown, tell your children about the virtues of honesty, integrity and honor and how they guide your actions as a legislator, now that your vote is recorded? You must be so proud.

*
Representatives voting aye were: Alexander, Brooks H, Brooks K, Butt, Campbell, Carr, Casada, Cobb, Coley, Dean, Dennis, Dunn, Elam, Eldridge, Evans, Floyd, Forgety, Gotto, Halford, Hall, Harrison, Hawk, Haynes, Hensley, Hill, Holt, Hurley, Johnson C, Johnson P, Keisling, Lollar, Lundberg, Maggart, Marsh, Matheny, Matlock, McCormick, Miller D, Montgomery, Niceley, Pody, Powers, Ragan, Ramsey, Rich, Sanderson, Sargent, Sexton, Shipley, Sparks, Swann, Todd, Weaver, White, Williams R, Wirgau, Womick, Madam Speaker Harwell

 Senators voting aye were: Bell, Campfield, Crowe, Faulk, Gresham, Haile, Johnson, Kelsey, Ketron, McNally, Norris, Overbey, Southerland, Tracy, Watson, Woodson, Yager, Mr. Speaker Ramsey

Saturday, September 15, 2012

Replying to Dr. Adizes' Question, Is There a Problem with Democracy?'


This post is a reply to Dr. Adizes' recent article, Is There a Problem with Democracy, found at:
http://www.ichakadizes.com/blog/?utm_source=Is+There+a+Problem+with+Democracy%3F&utm_campaign=Ichak+Adizes+Blog+September+2012&utm_medium=email

I encourage you to read his thoughts.

Dear Dr. Adizes,

I have on my book shelf a copy of your book, "Lifecycles", which I bought decades ago and refer to quite often.  I regret not having had the opportunity to study under you. Happily, I find your messages a way to stay linked.

I write in response to your article Is 'There a Problem With Democracy?'

In a democracy, there should be demonstrations, as demonstrations are an expression of one’s demands to redress wrongs or, indeed to demonstrate support for something.

You rightfully point out the major flaws, corruption and lack of trust, but these are not reactions to a highly complex system being hard for people en masse to understand. The reality is that they, indeed, ‘get it’. They see that the system is corrupt, that their elected representatives are bought by corporate interests and no longer represent the interests of their constituents. They understand full well that the opposition is also corrupt, and their intent is to regain power so they can refill their coffers at the public (and private) trough.

One side wants to work for the public interest by imposing their beliefs on others and by raiding the tax system for the benefit of their corporate owners and their rich friends. The people understand that the other side is ‘in theory’ fighting for individual rights and redistribution of income – while writing laws that legalize the arrests of anyone, citizen or not, anywhere I the world, use trade initiatives to further weaken the nation’s competitive position in the world, and move people into poverty. What is there to trust?  It matters not who we elect under such a ‘system’.  

Imagine, professor, a classroom with two rows of tables, with fours students per table, all eager to learn. I announce we are going to ‘hire’ a number of them, but only the best. To determine who is best, I have them remove all the desks from the left side of the room, leaving space for a race.

We pair people up and have them run from the back of the room to the front, with the winner labeled ‘best’. After all the races are complete, we proceed to part two of the selection process. Here we have a second race, in which the ‘winners’ race against the losers. This time the losers must run in the same area as before but the winners must race down the row that still contains the desks.

At first, the people are confused, and say rightfully that there are desks in the way, obstructions. I agree, and maintain that this is part of the phase two test. What am I teaching?  That in a crappy system, it doesn’t matter how good you are, Even the best cannot win against a rigged (corrupt) system,

The complexity you refer to is not that hard to understand. It’s often times transparent. The values you refer to are still at their core good. The system manipulators have broken their implied contract with their constituents, who unfortunately were too busy with their lives to pay attention.

“Entitlements”  are systems in which people paid in their own monies with expectations of deferred rewards. The politicians ‘raided’ the treasury. Financial special interests viewed the size of the pot and lusted after it for the profits denied them, then sought by legislation to avail themselves of them.

Democracy is not the problem, Criminals are the problem. There’s nothing wrong with Christianity – except the Christians (see Jews, see Islam). All have noble precepts. All, over time, are corrupt. I call your attention to your bell curve, and the phases of decline you refer to as Early Aristocracy and beyond.

The phases always occur, as predictable as your life cycles. They occur because, over time, the systems fall victim to neglect. We neglected our people, forgot to teach history, civics. We forgot to retain emphasis on learning, let our standards fall (collapse?). You know all this. The failing occurs when religious leaders yield to, and participate in corruption, when politicians work for themselves, when our military is used to advance our empires at the expense of those upon whose rights we tread,

Democracy is not the problem. That we no longer have one is.